The Terri Schiavo case...
This isn't something I would normally even get involved in, but so many people (on blogs and in the press) are making comments that are so completely vacuous, that they've grated my will to the degree I must respond.
The gloves are now off.
Today, the President and the Congress have taken steps to keep Terri alive, why Democrats oppose this we may never fully understand.
What is the hurry to kill this woman?
But if one more commentator says something to the effect of "I sympathize with Mrs. Schiavo, but I don't like the fact that the Gov't is getting involved. They should be focused on the War, not be involving themselves with peoples' personal business,"
I am going to scream (sorry neighbors)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why I have to point out the unbelievably obvious point is beyond me. I'm going to try to be gentle here, now, who do you think signs the paycheck of the judge who ordered Terri’s feeding tube pulled?
THE GOV’T!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Gov’t, via that judge, has already made the decision she should die.
Do you know she hasn't even had an MRI yet! But one Clinton appointed judge in Florida want's to kill her!
Which begs the question, why are Democrats so eager to see her die? Rep. Jim Davis of Florida said any congressional action to keep her alive is “a clear threat to our democracy.”
Exactly how Jim?
Does anyone else see the irony? If a man goes out and murders 4 people, and then confesses to it, liberals will avail every single legal option to save his life, yet here, they try to block every single option to save her.
Has the Democrat party finally become a demonic cult of death?
What is going on here?
I’ve seen Mrs. Schiavo on T.V., her eyes will follow an object, you can tell she tries to smile, and you can tell she’s nearly bursting to talk.
She may have some diminished brain function, but this woman is alive, and clearly wants to live, but Democrats want Gov’t, via a judge, to kill her.
O.K. Democrats, are you saying there is an I.Q. test to be allowed to live now?
Who sets that bar?
And think about this, if you fools set it at say 60, you’ll wipe out your voter base.
posted by commonsense2 | 2:07 PM
3 Comments:
The criminals have rights!! she (her parents) and the unborn don't. if the IQ was set at 60 would frank still be around? or becky?
I have spent a lot of time watching Animal Planet's Animal Cops. I have seen many people arrested for starving their animals. Why is it that we treat our animals more humainly that humans? If an animal were sick, we would "put them to sleep." It we stopped feeding them and giving them water, we would be arrested for animal cruelty. Even more, we treat are criminals better than we are treating this woman. Scott Peterson will be given food and water up until the day he dies.
I do, however, think that seabee41 could do with a little less food...
The Deathocrats are putting forth the circular arguement that Terri must be put to death to end her suffering, but since she is "vegetative" she isn't suffering by starving to death, but she must be put to death to end her suffering, but she isn't suff.....
Post a Comment
<< Home